Dear Colleagues,
Last week [February 15-16, 1999], we held this winter's second LCD simulation meeting at Fermilab. At this moment, most of our projects are still in their preliminary stages, but a large number of projects have been started which we hope will produce results for the Sitges meeting. A list of the talks we are preparing for Sitges is given in the accompanying message. Please notify me of any omissions.
The scanned tranparencies from the Fermilab meeting are now available on the Web at this URL.
The rest of this message gives a status report on the simulation and
analysis tools. As of now, these are only partially complete.
I will give my understanding of the priorities toward producing results
for Sitges. Discussion of these priorities, requests for new tools,
and announcements of new tools, will take place in the lcd-sim email conference.
(To subscribe, send email to majordomo@slac.stanford.edu
with the message `subscribe lcd-sim'; to post a message, send email to
lcd-sim@slac.stanford.edu.)
At Fermilab, Richard Dubois presented single-particle studies of the calorimetric resolution of the large and small detector models. Gary Bower has promised to post calibration constants from this study on the simulation group Web pages.
At Fermilab, we agreed not to tweak the two model detector designs further before Sitges. However, if additional bugs are discovered in the full simulation software, Richard may post a `version 1.0' at the time of the Michigan meeting and ask that the data samples be rerun. We will discuss at Michigan whether this will be necessary.
There are two important deficiencies with the fast MC program. At the moment, the model small and large detector designs are wired in, although the virtue of this program was supposed to be that one could use it to study variations in the detector design. We are promised that it is straightforward to modify the detector geometry by actually going into the code. People interested in doing this should contact Joanne Bogart. I hope that some general instructions for this modification can be posted to lcd-sim.
Second, at the moment, the fast MC returns smeared tracks but not yet track error matrices. Bruce Schumm has promised to add this information to the code.
For our attempt to prioritize work for Sitges, it is very important for us to understand how many groups are planning to use the fast MC and what capabilities they will require. If this facility is important to you, please contact Joanne Bogart as soon as possible at the address above.
At the moment, we have an understanding of the tracking resolution of the two detector models, based on Bruce Schumm's simulation results, but no detailed track finding and fitting. At Fermilab, Rob Kutschke reported on a Kalman filter for track fitting that could be extracted from the Fermilab MCFast package and adapted to our analyses. Keith Riles offered to work with Rob to make this available; however, this may not happen soon enough to be relevant to studies for Sitges.
Many useful analysis tools, including cluster finders and a track-finding package ported by Mike Ronan from the BABAR software, are included in the JAS analysis package. Tony Johnson has promised to submit an update on the tools available in JAS at the end of February.
At Fermilab, Howie Baer reported on the new release of ISAJET, which now includes beamstrahlung and initial state radiation as well as initial-state polarization. Michael Peskin reported on a new event generator, pandora, which in principle provides a general framework for linear collider processes. People who need an event generator with specific properties not available from ISAJET or PYTHIA should contact Michael.
I look forward to seeing you all at the University of Michigan, March
26-28.
Good luck,
Michael